<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Nokia 5530 XM vs Nokia N82 : Size Comparison Pictures</title> <atom:link href="http://unleashthephones.com/2009/10/21/nokia-5530-xm-vs-nokia-n82-size-comparison-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://unleashthephones.com/2009/10/21/nokia-5530-xm-vs-nokia-n82-size-comparison-pictures/</link> <description>Mobile Phone News, Reviews and More</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ye Giant Nokia 5530 XpressMusic Review &#124; ZOMG its Cj</title><link>http://unleashthephones.com/2009/10/21/nokia-5530-xm-vs-nokia-n82-size-comparison-pictures/#comment-7788</link> <dc:creator>Ye Giant Nokia 5530 XpressMusic Review &#124; ZOMG its Cj</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:04:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://zomgitscj.com/?p=4351#comment-7788</guid> <description>[...] 49 x 13 mm and weighs in at just 107 g. This makes the device pretty tiny in our eyes. We&#8217;ve compared it to the N82, compared it to the E75 and compared it to the N97 and its definitely the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 49 x 13 mm and weighs in at just 107 g. This makes the device pretty tiny in our eyes. We&#8217;ve compared it to the N82, compared it to the E75 and compared it to the N97 and its definitely the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 14/19 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: unleashthephones.com @ 2012-02-13 23:16:36 -->
